presents
Voter’s Edge California
Conozca la información antes de votar.
Presentado por
MapLight
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
November 6, 2018 — Elección General de California
Local

City of Pacific Grove
Measure M Initiative Statute - Majority Approval Required

To learn more about measures, follow the links for each tab in this section. For most screenreaders, you can hit Return or Enter to enter a tab and read the content within.

Resultados electorales

Passing

4,452 votos si (57.48%)

3,293 votos no (42.52%)

Shall the Pacific Grove Municipal Code Section 23.64.350 be amended to prohibit short-term rentals in residential districts outside the Coastal Zone, provide an 18-month phase-out period for existing permitted short-term rentals that become nonconforming uses under the measure, and require voter approval of any changes to the measure except with regard to the Coastal Zone or enforcement?

¿Qué es esta propuesta?

Información básica sobre la iniciativa de ley — Información oficial sobre esta iniciativa

Un voto por el SÍ significa

A “Yes” vote on Measure M amends Pacific Grove’s General Plan and Municipal Code Section 23.64 to prohibit Short-Term Rentals on residential properties outside the Coastal Zone.

Un voto por el NO significa

A “No” vote on Measure M does not change the Pacific Grove General Plan or Municipal Code Section 23.64.

Análisis del analista legislativo / Proposal

Monterey County Elections Office

Measure M proposes to amend the Pacific Grove General Plan and Pacific Grove Municipal Code (Municipal Code) Section 23.64 governing short-term rental units (STRs).  It would prohibit STRs in residential districts outside the Coastal Zone. The Measure would not limit City authority to license or regulate short-term rentals in the Coastal Zone or in non-residential zoning districts.  This measure was placed on the ballot by Citizen’s Initiative.  

Presently, a license is required to operate any STR.  Use Fees apply to each STR license and Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is collected on units rented as a percentage of the amount charged by each operator.  Existing regulations limit the number of STR licenses allowed on each block, and limit STRs to a maximum of 250 within the City.  

The Measure amends the City General Plan to 1) prohibit STRs on residential properties outside the Coastal Zone; 2) allow STRs on properties within the Coastal Zone; and 3) require voter approval to further amend the General Plan relating to STRs. 

The Measure amends Municipal Code Section 23.64 to 1) prohibit STRs on residential properties outside the Coastal Zone; 2) sunset prohibited STR licenses after an 18-month phase out period, ending on or about May 2020; 3) allow home sharing, house swaps, house sitting, pet sitting, work trade, or similar non-commercial arrangements; 4) re-adopt existing definitions, liability and enforcement provisions related to STRs; and 5) require voter approval to amend Municipal Code section 23.64.350.  Future voter approval is not required for amendments that apply solely to STRs within the Coastal Zone, or that address liability or enforcement relating to STRs.

At its June 20, 2018 meeting, the City Council received the independent analysis of Matrix Consulting Group to examine potential revenue impacts if Measure M is adopted. The analysis reported annual City TOT revenue would decline by $1,129,731 and annual fee revenue would decline by $122,323. The consultant found a significant likelihood the City would also experience declines in sales tax revenue and increased enforcement costs but did not quantify these later effects.

A majority of voters of the City casting ballots in favor of this Measure is required to modify the Municipal Code and General Plan.  This Measure has no sunset date.  

A “YES” vote on Measure M amends Pacific Grove’s General Plan and Municipal Code Section 23.64 to prohibit Short-Term Rentals on residential properties outside the Coastal Zone.  

A “NO” vote on Measure M does not change the Pacific Grove General Plan or Municipal Code Section 23.64.

By:

David C. Laredo

City Attorney, City of Pacific Grove

Published Arguments — Arguments for and against the ballot measure

Argumento A FAVOR

For over 100 years Pacific Grove has been known as a “City of Homes.” The Pacific Grove City Charter, General Plan, and Municipal Code recognize that Pacific Grove is “primarily a city of homes” and that “business and industry shall be compatible with its residential character.” Measure M affirms Pacific Grove as a City of Homes by limiting Short-Term Vacation Rentals, which are not compatible with Pacific Grove’s residential character.

Short-Term Vacation Rentals (STRs) are simply not compatible with residential uses. Our neighbors –Monterey and Carmel –wisely prohibit STRs in residential areas and actively pursue violators to protect their neighborhoods. The city’s zoning code historically prohibited STRs in residential zoning districts, but in 2010 the city abandoned its longstanding commitment to its neighborhoods to instead extract hotel tax from residential neighborhoods. A city should never become dependent on hotel tax revenue from residential neighborhoods, but that’s exactly what’s happened in Pacific Grove.

Since then residents have been evicted to make room for STRs, outside investors have swooped in to take advantage of the new commerce, neighborhoods have been negatively changed, and the inns and motels important to our local economy for years say they have been hurt.

The city’s lottery in May was intended to reduce the density of STRs in some areas, with 51 of the licenses being retired next April. However, 45 of the 51 licenses will become available for new locations. If you don’t have one nextdoor yet, you may soon.

Measure M is a zoning measure. VOTE YES to restore zoning rules that protect residential neighborhoods. VOTE YES to limit Short-Term Vacation Rentals. Visit www.pgneighbors.com for further details.

/s/ Joan Hyler, Resident

/s/ Kim Akeman, Resident

/s/ Teresa Stasio, Resident

/s/ Ted Hollister, Resident

/s/ Luke Coletti, Resident 

— Monterey County Elections Dept

Argumento EN CONTRA

Measure M will damage Pacific Grove’s ability to provide fundamental services: it will permanently deprive the City of $1.3 million per year, paid by visitors, at a time when pension payments are predicted to jump from $2.2 to $4.1 million per year.  

 

Measure M will eliminate critical revenues by slashing Short-Term Rentals (STRs) by 70% and restricting them to a few neighborhoods along the Coast. Measure M treats some neighbors differently than others, but we are one community and need to work together to support our city.  Some claim eliminating STRs would add affordable housing.  Surveys within our City indicate that banned STRs would likely become vacant second homes or rented at market rates. 

 

The City’s STR Program is strictly regulated and balances the needs of the community and the financial realities of the City. STRs are capped at 250 out of more than 8,300 housing units in Pacific Grove.  Parking access, noise, occupancy and density are regulated.  The program mandates responsible, responsive management. Complaints are investigated and addressed with appropriate penalties, which include fines and loss of a license.  All responses and adjustments to regulations are based on validated data.

 

STRs play a positive role in both the quality of life and financial health of Pacific Grove. Visitors from around the world have always been drawn to our quaint charm and extraordinary scenery. Visitors add to the vibrancy of our city, support our shops and restaurants, boost local employment and increase tax revenue. STR visitors’ Transient Occupancy Taxes paid for 7% of our budget, supporting the Library, recreation facilities, Police and Fire, road and sidewalk repairs, parks and programs for youth and seniors.   

 

Measure M will damage our city for years to come.  Give Pacific Grove a viable future.  

 

Vote No on Measure M.

 

/s/ Cynthia Garfield

/s/ William Fredrickson

/s/ Daniel R. Reed, Chief Customer Officer

/s/ John S. RouseII, Realtor/Broker Associate

/s/ Kenneth E. Cuneo  

— Monterey County Elections Dept

Refutación al argumento A FAVOR

100 years ago, Pacific Grove welcomed visitors for short and long stays. Visitors stayed in tents, homes, hotels and boarding houses.  Then and now, visitors come to Pacific Grove to enjoy the same things we enjoy.  

Visitors do more than enjoy –they help create a vibrant city through taxes, shopping revenue, jobs and restaurant visits. Hotels are backing this “citizen’s initiative” as a way of restricting visitor choices. But like us, visitors want choice. Many visitors who want to stay in a home with a yard, living room and kitchen will make a choice to take their dollars to Pebble Beach, Big Sur, Seaside or Santa Cruz at the expense of our city. Our revenue and our future will be jeopardized.

STRs have changed Pacific Grove in positive ways.  We have avibrant downtown, when 10 years ago our city was struggling.  Homes that are STRs have improved neighborhoods as they have been upgraded, landscaped and maintained.  They provide paychecks for our residents: housekeepers, contractors and maintenance teams. The visitors staying here make a real contribution: they shop here, dine here, buy books here and sip coffee in our vibrant downtown.

With the extreme limits imposed by Measure M, the city faces cutbacks that will reduce the quality of life here for a long time.  Residents will face increased taxes or a reduced police force, library cuts, and neglected parks and streets.

Vote NO on Measure M. It’s a risk we can’t afford.

/s/ Henry I. (Hank) Armstrong, President

/s/ DanielR. Reed, Chief Customer Officer

/s/ John S. Rouse II, Realtor/Broker Associate

/s/ William Fredrickson, Retired

/s/ Kenneth E. Cuneo

— Monterey County Elections Dept

Refutación al argumento EN CONTRA

 The argument against Measure M completely ignores the quality of life of residents who are impacted by the Short-Term Vacation Rentals (STRs) –long-term renters evicted to make room for them, and neighbors subjected to all hours coming and going, noisy disruptions, rowdy parties, blocked driveways, and trash left in the streets. 

STR owners and supporters won’t acknowledge those disruptions because few of them live near the “mini-motels” from which they profit. City records list out-of-town addresses for 82% of the STR owners.

Here are the facts: 

• We need more housing for people to live and work in PG, not less.

• We have more than 1,000 rooms, suites and cottages for visitors at established inns that have supported the local economy for decades. 

• Measure M will not impair city services as opponents claim. That is hysteria. PG has survived more than 100 years without STRs.

• The city placed Measure U on the ballot, a proposal to raise Transient Occupancy Tax on overnight rentals. City surveys indicate it will easily pass.

• The city’s fiscal analysis indicates voter approval of both Measures M and U could cause a net loss of $265,182 –1% of the city budget. 

• STRs haven’t boosted the local economy as they claim. City sales tax collections have been about the same for the past five years.

 

The city’s largest Homeowners Associations (Country Club Gate, Forest Grove, The Glen and Monarch Pines) all prohibit STRs. Why should your neighborhood be any different? Please Vote YES on Measure M.

/s/ Robin Aeschliman, Resident

/s/ Pamela Chrislock, Resident

/s/ Donald Murphy, Resident

/s/ Thom Akeman, Resident

 

 
— Monterey County Elections Dept

Leer la legislación propuesta

Legislación propuesta

To the Honorable City Clerk of the City of Pacific Grove: We, the undersigned, registered and qualified voters of the City of Pacific Grove, hereby propose an initiative measure to amend the Pacific Grove General Plan and the Pacific Grove Municipal Code. We petition you to submit this measure to the City Council of the City of Pacific Grove for adoption of the measure outright, or for submission of the measure to the voters of the City of Pacific Grove at the earliest election for which it qualifies.

 

The measure provides as follows:

Initiative to Preserve and Protect Pacific Grove's Residential Character

 

The people of the City of Pacific Grove do ordain as follows:

SECTION 1: PURPOSE, EFFECT, AND FINDINGS

A.          Purpose: The purpose of this Initiative to Preserve and Protect Pacific Grove's Residential Character ("Initiative") is to prohibit and phase out existing permitted short-term rentals in residential neighborhoods, thereby advancing the central premise of the City of Pacific Grove's charter that business and industry shall be compatible with Pacific Grove's residential character.

B.          Effect: This Initiative amends the City of Pacific Grove's General Plan and Municipal Code to prohibit and phase out existing permitted short-term rentals in residential districts, except in the Coastal Zone. It establishes an 18-month sunset period for short-term rentals prohibited under this Initiative. It does not change existing rules for licensing short-term rentals where they are not prohibited or existing rules permitting home sharing.

C.          Findings: The people of the City of Pacific Grove find that this Initiative promotes and protects the health, safety, welfare, and quality of life of City residents, based upon the following findings, any one of which is sufficient to support adoption of this Initiative:

1.            Pacific Grove Is Primarily a City of Homes and the City Must Protect Its Residential Character. As of December 21, 2017, the date that the notice of intention to circulate this Initiative was submitted to the elections official of the City of Pacific Grove ("Submittal Date"), the Pacific Grove City Charter, in Article 5.5, the Pacific Grove General Plan, and the Pacific Grove Municipal Code recognize that Pacific Grove is "primarily a city of homes" and that "business and industry shall be compatible with its residential character." 

2.            Residential Land Use Designations Protect Residential Uses. The purpose of Pacific Grove's residential districts is to provide appropriately zoned areas within the City for long-term residents and to enhance and maintain the residential character of the City. The City of Pacific Grove's Zoning Map depicting the City's residential districts is attached as Exhibit A for informational purposes.

3.            Residential Districts Are Intended for Long-Term Housing. The Pacific Grove General Plan defines "dwelling unit" as "A room or group of rooms—including sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation facilities—that constitutes an independent housekeeping unit, occupied or intended for occupancy by one household on a long-term basis (i.e., for more than 30 days.)" (Pacific Grove General Plan, Glossary, p. 175). This Initiative protects the integrity of residential neighborhoods by prohibiting short-term rental of residential property in residential districts outside the Coastal Zone. 

4.             Short-Term Rental Is a Commercial Use Incompatible with Residential Uses. The short-term rental of residential property is a commercial use that is in conflict with the longstanding definition of a "dwelling unit" as a "long-term" residence and is incompatible with the character of residential neighborhoods. 

5.            Use of Residential Property for Short-Term Rentals Threatens Residential Neighborhoods. As the California Court of Appeal recognized in Ewing v. City of Carmel-By-The-Sea (1991) 234 Cal.App.3d 1579, short-term rentals have unmitigable, adverse impacts because they threaten the character and stability of a residential neighborhood. Short-term tenants have little interest in the welfare of Pacific Grove's residents or local government; the Ewing court observed that transient visitors are "here today and gone tomorrow – without engaging in the sort of activities that weld and strengthen a community." 

6.            The City's Actions to Allow Short-Term Rentals Interfere with Pacific Grove's Residential Character. In 2010, the City began allowing rentals for stays of less than 30 days in residential districts. The City's attempts to regulate short-term rentals have been inadequate to manage the adverse impacts of these commercial uses on Pacific Grove's residential character. Short-term rentals have increased traffic, parking demand, light and glare, and noise, to the detriment of surrounding residential uses and the general welfare of Pacific Grove. In addition, management and enforcement needs have imposed new demands on city resources, including police, community development, and code enforcement, while burdening neighbors with unwanted monitoring and reporting responsibilities. 

7.            The City's Recent Efforts to Mitigate Adverse Impacts of Short-Term Rentals Are Insufficient.In 2017, the City adopted a cap on short-term rental licenses and limits on density with the stated intent of eliminating over-concentration of short-term rentals in particular neighborhoods. However, these regulations will be ineffective because the City included a "grandfathering" provision that will allow existing short-term rentals to continue operating indefinitely. The new regulations will not generate a meaningful reduction in the adverse impacts of short-term rentals in Pacific Grove.

8.            Pacific Grove Provides Ample Lodging for Visitors Without Short-Term Rentals in Residential Districts.This Initiative does not change existing rules for bed and breakfast inns, motels, hotels, and other visitor lodging in Pacific Grove. In addition, in 2011, Pacific Grove voters approved Measure U, which allows for additional motel guest units and room tax revenue. Further, residents may allow short-term occupancy of their homes for home sharing, house swaps, house sitting, pet sitting, work trade, and similar arrangements. These additional activities are compatible with residential uses and are not prohibited by this Initiative. These types of accommodations provide ample lodging to serve visitors while preserving Pacific Grove's residential character. 

D.          Flexibility: This Initiative preserves important flexibility for the City, based upon the following:

1.            The City May Address Short-Term Rentals in the Coastal Zone in the Local Coastal Program Update.The California Coastal Act imposes restrictions on the use of land in the Coastal Zone, including Pacific Grove's coast. The California Coastal Commission, which implements the Coastal Act, has stated that regulation of short-term rentals in the Coastal Zone must occur within the context of the Local Coastal Program, subject to Commission review. The City is currently drafting a comprehensive update to Pacific Grove's Local Coastal Program. While this Initiative does not prohibit short-term rentals in the Coastal Zone, it identifies local conditions that the Commission has acknowledged may support short-term rental restrictions in the Coastal Zone, namely that the community "already provides an ample supply of vacation rentals" and that "further proliferation of vacation rentals would impact community character." This Initiative does not prevent the City from imposing a short-term rental ban or further limitations in the Coastal Zone. The City of Pacific Grove's Coastal Zone Land Use Plan, Figure 4, depicting the Coastal Zone boundaries is attached as Exhibit B for informational purposes.

2.            The City May Adopt Additional Rules to Facilitate Effective Enforcement.This Initiative is enforceable under existing provisions of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code. It does not constrain the City's authority to conduct code enforcement in the manner that best protects the welfare of the entire community. 

3.             Limited Sharing of Single-Family Homes Will Not Erode Pacific Grove's Residential Character. Under the permitting scheme established by the Pacific Grove home sharing ordinance in effect as of the Submittal Date, a long-term resident may rent one or two rooms in a single-family home to a maximum of two adults and two children, while the long-term resident also occupies the home. The ordinance's home sharing permit requirement and strict limits on home sharing protect Pacific Grove's residential character and ensure that residential property is used by long-term residents. This Initiative does not change the City's existing rules for home sharing.

4.            Future General Plan Updates Must Be Consistent with This Initiative. As of the Submittal Date, the City of Pacific Grove was considering possible General Plan amendments directed at short-term rentals. Adoption of this Initiative ensures that the will of the people to prohibit short-term rentals in residential districts, as described in this Initiative, is fulfilled. This Initiative is not intended to direct or constrain the City with respect to its ability to amend, revise, or update the General Plan or other land use regulations. However, if this Initiative is adopted, any amendment, revision, or update to the General Plan adopted after the Submittal Date shall be amended to ensure consistency with this Initiative.

  

SECTION 2: PACIFIC GROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS

A.            This Initiative hereby amends the Pacific Grove General Plan ("General Plan"), as amended through the Submittal Date. Text to be inserted in the General Plan by this Initiative is indicated in bold type. The language adopted by this Section 2 may be repealed or amended only by a vote of the people. 

B.             The General Plan Land Use Element (which is a part of the General Plan) is amended to add the following new Policy 1.5:

Policy 1.5     Protect Pacific Grove's residential character by prohibiting the short-term (less than 30 consecutive calendar days) rental of residential property in residential zoning districts, except to the extent such use is allowed in the Coastal Zone under the Local Coastal Program. The Pacific Grove Municipal Code shall be consistent with this Policy.

C.            The General Plan Land Use Element is amended to add the following text after Policy 1.5: 

                Policy 1.5 was added by the Initiative to Preserve and Protect Pacific Grove's Residential Character. Policy 1.5 may be repealed or amended only by a vote of the people. The Initiative also amended the Pacific Grove Municipal Code to be consistent with Policy 1.5, including a requirement that existing transient use of residential property inconsistent with Policy 1.5 be discontinued within 18 months from the date the Initiative was approved by the voters. 

SECTION 3: PACIFIC GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS

A.            This Initiative hereby amends the Pacific Grove Municipal Code ("Municipal Code" or "PGMC"), as amended through the Submittal Date. New text to be inserted in the Municipal Code is indicated in boldtype, and text to be deleted is indicated in strikethrough type. Text in standard type currently appears in the Municipal Code. 

B.             PGMC 23.64.350, "Transient use of residential property for remuneration," is amended and readopted in full as follows:

23.64.350 Transient use of residential property for remuneration.

(a) Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter certain terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in this chapter, and such meanings shall prevail in case of conflict with the definitions set forth in Chapter 23.08 PGMC.

(1) "Person" means an individual, a group of individuals, or an association, firm, partnership, corporation or other entity, public or private.

(2) "Owner" means the person who possesses fee title to a transient use site.

(3) "Owner representative" means any person authorized by the owner to fully manage the transient use site.

(4) "Remuneration" means compensation, money, rent, or other bargained for consideration given in return for occupancy, possession or use of real property.

(5) "Residential property" means any dwelling unit, except those dwelling units lawfully established as second units established pursuant to Chapter 23.80 PGMC or as part of a bed and breakfast inn, motel, hotel, timeshare development, or other transient use not prohibited by this section.

(6) "Responsible tenant" means a person aged 18 or older who has received notice of occupancy, parking and other limits and regulations that apply to the transient use site, and who has agreed to be responsible to ensure that impermissible or inappropriate behavior does not occur at the transient use site.

(7) "Transient" means a period of time less than 30 consecutive calendar days.

(8) "Transient use of residential property" means the commercial use, by any person, of residential property for transient lodging uses where the term of occupancy, possession or tenancy of the property by the person entitled to such occupancy, possession or tenancy is less than 30 consecutive calendar days. 

(9) "Transient use site" and "transient use" mean property occupied and used for transient or short-term rental purposes.

(10) "Use" means the purpose for which land or premises of a building thereon is designed, arranged or intended, or for which it is or may be occupied or maintained.

(b) Transient use of residential property must comply with General Plan Policy 1.5. Specifically, transient use of residential property for remuneration is prohibited, and no transient use license may be issued, in any residential zoning district, including R-1, R-H, R-1-H, R-1-B-2, R-1-B-3, R-2, R-2-B-3, R-3, R-3-P.G.R., R-3-M, R-4, and all PUD Districts, except to the extent that such use is both (1) in the Coastal Zone and permitted under the Local Coastal Program, and (2) permitted by a transient use license issued by the City. Transient use of residential property for remuneration in non-residential zoning districts is prohibited, except (1) as otherwise expressly permitted by this title, or (2) when such use is permitted by a transient use license issued in accord with Chapter 7.40 PGMC by the City. Transient use of residential property for remuneration does not include "home sharing" permitted by the City or house swaps, house sitting, pet sitting, work trade, and similar non-commercial arrangements that do not involve an exchange of money.

(c) In order to provide a reasonable phase-out of transient uses of residential property for remuneration, notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, all uses that become nonconforming as a result of the amendment to this section by the Initiative to Preserve and Protect Pacific Grove's Residential Character, including uses permitted under short-term rental licenses, shall be discontinued within 18 months from the date that the Initiative was approved by the voters. Nothing in this subsection is intended to affect any City authority to terminate uses found to be a nuisance, or that are otherwise unlawful.

(d) Liability and Enforcement.

(1) Any owner, owner representative, responsible tenant, person acting as agent, real estate broker, real estate sales agent, property manager, reservation service or otherwise who uses, arranges, or negotiates for the use of residential property in violation of the provisions of this chapter is guilty of an infraction for each day in which such residential property is used, or allowed to be used, in violation of this chapter.

(2) Any owner, owner representative, responsible tenant, or other person who uses, or allows the use of, residential property in violation of the provisions of this chapter is guilty of an infraction for each day in which such residential property is used, or allowed to be used, in violation of this chapter.

(3) Violations of this chapter may be prosecuted pursuant to Chapter 1.16 PGMC, or enforced pursuant to Chapter 1.19 PGMC.

(4) Penalties may be assessed for violations as provided in Chapters 1.16, 1.19, and/or 7.40 PGMC. The maximum limits set for administrative penalties in PGMC 1.19.200, however, shall not apply to any violation of this chapter or Chapter 7.40 PGMC.

(e) This section may be repealed or amended only by a vote of the people, except that amendments do not require a vote of the people if they (1) apply only in the Coastal Zone or (2) amend subsection (d) concerning liability and enforcement.

C.             This Initiative does not prohibit the City from taking action to regulate transient use of residential property in the Coastal Zone or in non-residential districts. Such regulations may be adopted by the City Council as it deems necessary and appropriate.

SECTION 4: APPLICATION 

A.            The provisions of this Initiative shall not apply to the extent, but only to the extent, that they would violate the constitution or laws of the United States or the State of California.

B.             In the event a property owner contends that application of this Initiative effects an unconstitutional taking of property, the City may grant, upon request of the affected property owner, an exception to the application of any provision of this Initiative if the City finds, based on substantial evidence, that both (1) the application of that provision of this Initiative could constitute an unconstitutional taking of property, and (2) the exception will allow additional or continued land uses only to the minimum extent necessary to avoid such a taking.

SECTION 5: IMPLEMENTATION

A.            Effective Date: "Effective Date" means the date that this Initiative became effective pursuant to State law. 

B.             Pacific Grove General Plan: Upon the Effective Date of this Initiative, the provisions of Section 2 of the Initiative are hereby inserted into the Pacific Grove General Plan, as an amendment thereof; except that if the four amendments of the mandatory elements of the General Plan permitted by State law for any given calendar year have already been used in the year in which the Initiative becomes effective, this General Plan amendment shall be the first amendment inserted into the General Plan on January 1 of the following year. Upon the Effective Date of this Initiative, any provisions of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code or any other City of Pacific Grove ordinance or resolution that are inconsistent with the provisions adopted by this Initiative shall not be enforced in a manner inconsistent with this Initiative.

C.            Interim Amendments: All references in this Initiative to the Pacific Grove General Plan are to the General Plan in effect on the Submittal Date. That General Plan, as amended by this Initiative, comprises an integrated, internally consistent, and compatible statement of policies for the City of Pacific Grove. In order to ensure that nothing in this Initiative prevents the General Plan from being an integrated, internally consistent, and compatible statement of the policies of the City, as required by State law, and to ensure that the actions of the voters in enacting this Initiative are given effect, any amendment or update to the General Plan that is adopted between the Submittal Date and the date that the General Plan is amended by this Initiative measure shall, to the extent that such interim-enacted provision is inconsistent with the General Plan provisions adopted by this Initiative, be amended as soon as possible to ensure consistency between the provisions adopted by this Initiative and other provisions of the General Plan.

D.            Other Plans, Ordinances, and Policies: The City of Pacific Grove is hereby authorized and directed to amend the Pacific Grove General Plan and Municipal Code, and other ordinances and policies affected by this Initiative, as soon as possible and periodically thereafter as necessary to ensure consistency between the provisions adopted in this Initiative and other sections of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and other City plans, ordinances, and policies.

E.             Reorganization: The Pacific Grove General Plan and Municipal Code may be reorganized or readopted in different format, and individual provisions may be renumbered or reordered, in the course of ongoing updates of the General Plan and Municipal Code, provided that the provisions adopted or readopted in Sections 2 and 3 of this Initiative shall remain in the General Plan and Municipal Code, respectively, unless earlier repealed or amended by vote of the people of the City of Pacific Grove.

F.             Implementing Ordinances: The City Council is authorized, after a duly noticed public hearing, to adopt implementing ordinances, guidelines, rules, and/or regulations, as necessary, to further the purposes of this Initiative.

G.            Defense of Initiative: The City Council shall take all steps reasonably necessary to defend this Initiative against any challenge to its validity. 

H.            Project Approvals: Upon the Effective Date of this Initiative, the City of Pacific Grove shall not grant, or by inaction allow to be approved by operation of law, any General Plan amendment, rezoning, specific plan, license, use permit, development agreement, or any other discretionary entitlement that is inconsistent with this Initiative. This Section does not prohibit the City from renewing a short-term rental license for a short-term rental in existence on the date this Initiative is adopted, provided that the renewal shall not continue beyond the phase-out date established by PGMC 23.64.350(c), as amended by this Initiative.

SECTION 6: EFFECT OF COMPETING OR ALTERNATIVE MEASURE ON THE SAME BALLOT

This Initiative adopts a comprehensive scheme prohibiting short-term rentals in residential districts, except in the Coastal Zone. By voting for this Initiative, the voters expressly declare their intent that any other measure which appears on the same ballot as this Initiative and addresses short-term rentals in residential districts, except in the Coastal Zone, or conflicts with any provision of this Initiative, shall be deemed to conflict with the entire cohesive scheme adopted by this Initiative. Because of this conflict, if this Initiative and any such other City of Pacific Grove measure receive a majority of votes by the voters voting thereon at the same election, then the measure receiving the most votes in favor shall prevail and no provision of the other measure shall take effect. For the purposes of this Section 6, any other measure that appears on the same ballot as this Initiative and purports to amend any provision of this Initiative shall be deemed to directly conflict with this entire Initiative.

SECTION 7: SEVERABILITY AND INTERPRETATION

This Initiative shall be broadly construed in order to achieve its purpose. 

This Initiative shall be interpreted so as to be consistent with all applicable Federal and State laws, rules, and regulations. If any section, subsection, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause, phrase, part, or portion of this Initiative is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Initiative. The voters hereby declare that this Initiative, and each section, subsection, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause, phrase, part, or portion thereof would have been adopted or passed even if one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, subparagraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts, or portions were declared invalid or unconstitutional. If any provision of this Initiative is held invalid as applied to any person or circumstance, such invalidity shall not affect any application of this Initiative that can be given effect without the invalid application. 

Any singular term shall include the plural and any plural term shall include the singular. The title and captions of the various sections in this Initiative are for convenience and organization only, and are not intended to be referred to in construing the provisions of this Initiative.

SECTION 8: AMENDMENT OR REPEAL

Except as otherwise provided in this Initiative, this Initiative may be amended or repealed only by the voters of the City of Pacific Grove. 

SECTION 9: EXHIBITS

Two maps are attached to this Initiative as Exhibits for illustrative purposes only: (A) the City of Pacific Grove Zoning Map, and (B) the City of Pacific Grove Coastal Zone Land Use Plan, Figure 4. These maps are not affected by this Initiative.

Color maps are available at https://bit.ly/2M6LPGt

 

  

Exhibit A

Attached, for illustrative purposes only, is the City of Pacific Grove Zoning Map depicting the City's zoning districts. This is a reduced copy of the version of the Zoning Map that was posted on the City's website as of the Submittal Date. This map is not affected by this Initiative.

 

 

Exhibit B

Attached, for illustrative purposes only, is the Coastal Zone Land Use Plan, Figure 4, depicting the Coastal Zone boundaries. This is a reduced copy of the version of the Coastal Zone Land Use Plan, Figure 4, that was posted on the City's website as of the Submittal Date. This map is not affected by this Initiative.

 

Más información

Videos (1)

LWV Education meeting on Short term rental policies, including Measure M

Información del contacto

Información del contacto de la campaña por el sí Measure M
PG Neighbors
Email contact@pgneighbors.com
Pacific Grove Neighbors United
Phone: 831-375-2705
Información del contacto de la campaña por el no Measure M
Committee for a Financially Sound Pacific Grove
Email info@welovepg.com
Address:
PO Box 194
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
Use tabs to select your choice. Use return to create a choice. You can access your list by navigating to 'My List'.

Comparta este sitio para ayudar a otras personas a investigar sus opciones para las votaciones.

PUBLISHING:PRODUCTION SERVER:PRODUCTION